Result: Leicester Banks CC - 1st XI Won by 99 runs
Date: Sun 24th May 2009 @ 14:30
Type: Friendly
Scoring: Standard
Toss: Leicester Banks CC - 1st XI won the toss and decided to bat
R | B | 4s | 6s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rajun Patel | Retired Out | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Rohit Patel + | b Eliott Lodge | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
A Nai | Retired Out | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Brijesh Patel | b Harry Miller | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Unsure | ro | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Unsure | Not Out | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Vishal Somaya | Not Out | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Unsure | Did Not Bat | |||||
Unsure | Did Not Bat | |||||
Unsure | Did Not Bat | |||||
Unsure | Did Not Bat | |||||
Extras | ( 5b 2lb 10w ) | 17 | ||||
Total | (5 wickets, 40 overs) | 212 |
-1 ; -2 ; -3 ; -4 ;
-5 ; -6 ; -7 ; -8 ;
-9 ; -10 ;
O | M | R | W | Nb | Wd | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eliott Lodge | 6 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Harry Miller | 7 | 1 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Pramod Dewan | 7 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bob Beevers | 7 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oliver Lodge | 4 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
William Jennings | 5 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ben Lodge | 4 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
R | B | 4s | 6s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sam Pole | st Brijesh Patel | 30 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |
H Bhutta | b Brijesh Patel | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
paul illingworth | ct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Pramod Dewan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Bob Beevers | 30 | 0 | 4 | 0 | ||
Ben Lodge | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
John Bleby + | b Unsure | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Eliott Lodge | ro | 27 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
Harry Miller | b Unsure | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
William Jennings * | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Oliver Lodge | Not Out | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Extras | ( 8b 2lb 3w 2nb ) | 15 | ||||
Total | ( all out , 32.1 overs) | 113 |
18-1 H Bhutta (Sam Pole*); 19-2 paul illingworth (Sam
Pole*);
19-3 Pramod Dewan (Sam Pole*); -4 ;
-5 ; 78-6 Ben Lodge (John Bleby*);
87-7 John Bleby (Eliott Lodge*); 100-8 Harry Miller (Eliott
Lodge*);
113-9 Eliott Lodge (William Jennings*); 113-10 William
Jennings (Oliver Lodge*);
O | M | R | W | Nb | Wd |
---|
So far this season the Sunday XI have put up some respectable
displays, against The Banks though they took something of a beating.
The bowling performed well under some aggressive circumstances but the
batting, which should have been the stronger suit, rolled up a fat
cigar, bent over, and took a good caning with little protest.
The innings started well enough. A young Banks opener was soon
dispatched by Elliot Lodge but the next wicket wouldn't come. One bat
played correctly and scored slowly, his partner displayed rosette
winning agriculture in a manner which would have reduced a certain Mr
Boycott to foaming apoplexy. Countless times a heave across the line
would squirt in any direction but the one desired and fall just short
or just over a fielder which led to the skipper scratching his head
furiously and in real danger of splinters.
The bowling was pretty good. All three Lodge boys impressed with the
cherry, as did Harry 'Windy' Miller, but luck was in short supply. The
skipper mixed up his usual filth with the occasional good delivery and
was unlucky to see two decent chances go down. Ok one was a decent
chance but the other was a nailed on sitter that even Stevie Wonder
with a hangover would have fancied. The real bowling find however was
debutant Ali who sent down a good spell of medium pace, mixing up his
pace nicely. Kibworth were set 232 to win.
The batting plan was simple, both Ali and Sideshow fancied a break
after their bowling so Sam 'Tad' Pole opened with Hamza, another
promising Junior. Unfortunately Hamza's stay was relatively brief but
in his defence he showed a decent technique and was only removed by a
bowler with Premier Division experience. However I doubt if many
Kibworth batsman have been so gutted for so long after their dismissal
as he was. Hamza, if you are reading this mate, don't worry. Your
chance will come again and if you saw half the other dismissals at
least you tried to do the right thing.
The rest of the batting was something of a dismal procession. Tad did
his job but only Sideshow (who got a Jaffa) and Elliot (run out by some
fat twerp) showed anything like their potential. The game had long been
up by the time the skipper was undone by an outswinger than left him
comprehensively feng shui'd.
At the final analysis the home side had been shot out for just less
than half the runs they required on a wicket which played pretty well.
Any excuse offered would carry about as much credibility as a Sumo
wrestler claiming he is on a diet. Perhaps best to give it the
traditional 'I don't believe it!' and move on.